Saturday, June 25, 2016
  Home
Some Cover, Others Cover Up, Abbas Anti-Semitism
The PA Blood Libel Repeated by President Abbas was Already Debunked with CAMERA's Help
Former Undersecretary of State Thomas Pickering Testified in Favor of Iran Deal While Taking Money From Boeing
Bias by Editing: A Devilish Washington Post-Associated Press Detail
Where’s the Coverage? Hezbollah Works with Drug Cartels
Tribune Newspapers Contradicts Themselves in Refusing to Correct
Former NYT Jerusalem Bureau Chief Sees the Light
Timely Recall of Huffington Worldpost Op-Ed: More Acts of Jewish Terrorism than Muslim Terrorism in the United States
A Preoccupied Western Media Fails to Appreciate the Historic Revival of Ties Between Russia and Israel
CAMERA Waiting for Response to Letter to Mart Green About Little Town of Bethlehem
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Search:
Media Analyses
Journalists
Middle East Issues
Christian Issues
Names In The News
CAMERA Authors
Headlines & Photos
Errors & Corrections
Film Reviews
CAMERA Publications
Film Suggestions
Be An Activist
Adopt A Library
History of CAMERA
About CAMERA
Join/Contribute
Contact CAMERA
Contact The Media
Privacy Policy
 
Media Analyses





ReVista de Medio Oriente’s Letter Published in El País


On September 27, 2012, the Spanish newspaper El País published a letter from ReVista de Medio Oriente, CAMERA's Spanish Language Website, highlighting inconsistencies in its September 26 article “Un incómodo espectador” (An uncomfortable spectator), written by journalists Ignacio Cembrero and Ramón Besa.

Among numerous inaccuracies, the article's skewed sub-heading described Gilad Shalit as an “Israeli soldier involved in the Gaza Massacre”.

This is a CAMERA translation of the letter published in El País:

Comments on Gilad Shalit

The sub-heading of the article in the Sports section on September 28, 2012 regarding the possible attendance of Gilad Shalit as a guest to a Barça game (Barcelona Football Club) speaks of a “Controversy over the alleged invitation from the Barça to an Israeli soldier involved in the Gaza massacre, to attend the derby against Madrid on October 7 at the Camp Nou (Barcelona Stadium).” This sentence is misleading.

Firstly, Gilad Shalit is not an Israeli soldier “involved” in any massacre, but a young man who, while doing his obligatory military service was kidnapped by Hamas, which is considered a terrorist group by the European Union, the U.S. State Department and other Western countries. Shalit was in fact held prisoner for over five years by Hamas and therefore could not have been involved in any alleged military confrontation, since he was held against his will and was stripped of his Third Geneva Convention rights.

Secondly, the use of the term “Gaza massacre” could not be more biased, since it reduces an alleged confrontation between a country and an attacking entity into a propaganda slogan that turns the media into a mouthpiece for one of the parties.

 
Masha Gabriel
Director of ReVista de Medio Oriente

Bookmark and Share