Thursday, June 30, 2016
  Home
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Search:
Media Analyses
Journalists
Middle East Issues
Christian Issues
Names In The News
CAMERA Authors
Headlines & Photos
Errors & Corrections
Film Reviews
CAMERA Publications
Film Suggestions
Be An Activist
Adopt A Library
History of CAMERA
About CAMERA
Join/Contribute
Contact CAMERA
Contact The Media
Privacy Policy
 
Media Analyses





CAMERA Prompts New York Times Editor's Note on Jerusalem Eviction Cases


CAMERA has prompted a significant and extensive New York Times editor's note today on Diaa Hadid's error-ridden Jan. 15 article, "Evictions in Walled Old City Stir Up a 'Hornet's Nest."
 
 
 
 
In two posts earlier this month, CAMERA detailed how the Times reporter relied solely on the unfounded claims of Palestinian families facing eviction in Jerusalem's Old City ("Diaa Hadid Pokes a 'Hornet's Nest'" and "Diaa Hadid, Recycling Old Stories about Old City"). In an editor's note published in print today and appended to the online article today, The New York Times thoroughly clarifies the circumstances surrounding the Maswadi, Hashimeh and Sub Laban families.

The Jerusalem Journal article on Jan. 15 about Palestinian residents of Jerusalem's Old City who face eviction by Israeli organizations gave an incomplete description of the legal disputes in several cases. The descriptions were based on the tenants' accounts; the article should have included additional information from court documents or from the landlords. (The landlords are organizations that have reclaimed properties owned by Jews before Israel was established in 1948.)

In the case of Nazira Maswadi, the article said her new landlord was trying to evict her based on a claim that her estranged husband was dead (he is still alive). In fact, the landlord claims in court filings that the Maswadi family has not proved that it has paid rent.

In another case, the article quoted Nawal Hashimeh as saying she was being evicted for replacing a door to her apartment. But according to court documents, her rent payments had also been rejected because they were submitted by her son, whom the landlord said it had no contractual relationship with. (The landlord also claimed that three rent checks fell short of the amount owed.)

In a separate case, the article said Nora Sub Laban faced accusations that she had not continuously lived in her apartment, though she claimed that she had never left it. While the article said that Ms. Sub Laban had been battling eviction efforts for four decades and that the Israeli Supreme Court must now decide whether to consider her appeal, it should have noted that an Israeli court in 2014 upheld a lower-court finding that she had not returned to live at the property after renovations were completed in 2000 or 2001.

While the reporter tried to reach representatives of the landlord in the Sub Laban case, The Times should also have tried to reach the landlords involved in the other cases and their lawyers.

CAMERA commends Times editors for the comprehensive editor's note which sets the record straight.
 
As CAMERA noted last month, Hadid years ago worked for an anti-Israel NGO and had written that Israel was a country "founded on hate." Her Jan. 15 travesty, "Evictions in Walled Old City Stir Up a 'Hornet's Nest,'" which necessitated the remarkable editor's note, is more evidence that she has been unable to transition from anti-Israel activist to professional journalist. The questions that remain are: will Hadid continue down this partisan path? If so, will The Times continue to stoop so low as to employ a plainly anti-Israel advocate?
 
To see the other four corrections that CAMERA prompted on Diaa Hadid's reporting since she starting working for The New York Times last March, please see here.

Bookmark and Share