Wednesday, April 23, 2014
  Home
RSS Feed
Facebook
Twitter
Search:
Media Analyses
Journalists
Middle East Issues
Christian Issues
Names In The News
CAMERA Authors
Headlines & Photos
Errors & Corrections
Film Reviews
CAMERA Publications
Film Suggestions
Be An Activist
Adopt A Library
History of CAMERA
About CAMERA
Join/Contribute
Contact CAMERA
Contact The Media
Links
Privacy Policy
 
Media Analyses





Presspectiva Editor Yishai Goldflam Criticizes Ha'aretz's Yossi Sarid


Presspectiva Editor Yishai Goldflam criticized Ha'aretz columnist Yossi Sarid for reflexively blaming Israel even when the facts directly contradict him.  Ha'aretz  published Goldflam's letter to the editor on the same subject, translated below.

It's Enough to Automatically Blame Israel

Re: "Deperately seeking a U.S. plan for peace," by Yossi Sarid,  (Ha'aretz, 12/12/2010).

When analyzing the recent failure of the negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, Yosi Sarid claimed: "It's not quite clear what more the Palestinians could have done. … By contrast, it's hard to figure out what exactly Israel's positive contribution to the effort was but quite easy to see its negative role."

Well, Benjamin Netanyahu publicly declared to the entire world, in opposition to his party's platform and to the will of the majority of his voters, his support for a two state solution. Immediately afterwards, unprecedentedly, he froze construction in the West Bank and called upon Mahmoud Abbas to join him at the negotiating table. Only one month before the end of the moratorium, Abbas so kindly acquiesced as to meet Netanyahu as a result of American pressure, and a month later cancelled the talks because the moratorium had expired.

How exactly did Yossi Sarid reach his conclusion, when the facts demonstrate the exact opposite?

Enough with the automatic blaming of Israel for everything. Here is a clearcut example of a failure which could have been prevented had the Palestinian leadership acted more responsibly.

Yishai Goldflam


Bookmark and Share