"Shrill. Strident. Stubborn. Abrasive. Derisive. Cynical. These are adjectives used by New York Times journalists this month to describe Israel's prime minister or cabinet ministers.
And that was just in news articles. New York Times editorialists added a few additional descriptors to that list aggressive, combative, sarcastic, eager for a fight, and sabotaging diplomacy.
In fact, the only Israeli political party that merited a positive characterization by the Times was the far-left Meretz party, which was described in a news article as peace-seeking. The Meretz party with six seats of 120 in the Knesset is hardly representative of the mainstream. And while nearly all other Knesset members, including those in power, claim to be seeking peace, The New York Times is not having any of that. Nor do they want their readers to.
Continue reading about how The New York Times departs from its own guidelines with incomplete, partisan reporting to influence readers against Israel.