A new U.N. report about Gaza noted Hamas' rockets attacks, military buildup, successful and attempted kidnappings, and weapons smuggling, so why was a Reuters interview with the U.N.'s Robert Piper mum on these points? 
A Reuters article by Israel bureau chief Luke Baker provides a clear example of how a partisan journalist can spin what should have been an objective news account of a newly-released international report into a propaganda piece promoting one side’s position in a conflict. To Reuters' Luke Baker, Israel's brief detention of a Washington Post journalist was "wholly unacceptable" but Hamas's detention of Baker himself was, essentially, tea time. 
Along with foreign journalists, CAMERA's Tamar Sternthal was invited to testify at a Knesset subcommittee meeting on media bias. Do the reporters' proclamations of professionalism and objectivity hold up to scrutiny? 
A Reuters handbook tells reporters, and promises readers, that it will "take no side, tell all sides." But apparently this doesn't apply to Israel's side of a disputed shooting.