Washington Post

WASHINGTON POST-WATCH: A Tale of Two Papers

At the Washington Post, Palestinian responsibility for their own circumstances is not news. If Palestinian action causes immediate injury and death to other Palestinians, let alone to Jews, it's barely news.

WASHINGTON POST-WATCH: Stand Corrected

So when is a correction not a correction? Often, when it's a Washington Post attempt to remedy a mistake in the paper's Arab-Israeli coverage.

UPDATED: CAMERA Elicits Washington Post Correction

CAMERA prompted the following correction concerning a July 12 article by John Ward Anderson which erroneously reported on Palestinian attacks on Israel. The San Francisco Chronicle and the Boston Globe later ran the correction. NPR also corrected the same error. 

Hague Ruling Front Page News; Palestinian Attack Takes Second Place

Most major print media outlets covered the Hague's court ruling in front page articles, but did not accord the same attention to the subsequent Palestinian terrorist attacks--the reason for Israel's security barrier. The major newspapers varied in the amount of context given and in the emphasis of articles about the Palestinian attack. Some portrayed the bombing as an excuse for Israeli Prime Minister Sharon's to defy international law.

WASHINGTON POST-WATCH: Moore Omissions

CAMERA has charged that Washington Post coverage of Arab-Israeli news is notable for what's omitted rather than what's reported. A page one story in the July 1 Post illustrates the problem.

Editing the President

When is a presidential warning about Iran's nuclear threat to destroy Israel not news? When is the chief executive's reiteration of American criticism of Palestinian Arab leadership and support for Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's Gaza Strip withdrawal proposal similarly not newsworthy? When The Washington Post covers a speech by George W. Bush to the National Newspaper Association.