In remarks that were uncritically disseminated by several news outlets, former President Obama defended his decision not to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 on the grounds that settlements were rapidly expanding. Yet, the truth is otherwise, as CAMERA noted in The Daily Caller. 
Criticism of President Obama's decision to allow a UN resolution harshly critical of Israel triggered Secretary of State John F. Kerry to launch an elaborate defense. Did he make his case? 
Reporting on Israel's Jerusalem Day and diplomacy, The Washington Post served ‘Swiss cheese journalism' to readers—too many holes, not enough substance. 
Containing four of journalism's six basic elements doesn't mean a report is two-third's correct. As Washington Post coverage of Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy shows, one-third missing is not a passing grade. 
Context is a requirement of traditional journalism. That being so, Washington Post reporting on Secretary of State John Kerry's Brookings Institution speech ranked as highly untraditional.
As Congress has continued its review of the Iran deal, the time-worn stereotypes of Jews as dual-loyalists, using their money and nefarious influence to incite wars have been used to smear opponents of the agreement.
On Twitter, John Kerry's senior advisor Marie Harf shared Washington Post headline that exaggerated and even fabricated Israeli praise for the Iran deal. Both the administration and the newspaper owe readers a correction. 
Al-Quds (Jerusalem) Day in Iran continues to be celebrated annually with marches and cries of “Death to America!” and “Death to Israel!” This year's event took place during the conclusion of U.S.-led talks with Iran over its nuclear program. Not all major media noticed. 
As news coverage focused on nuclear talks with Tehran, CAMERA's Op-Ed in The Hill newspaper focused on a media mirage: a “moderating” Iran.