A New York Times Op-Ed by former President Jimmy Carter misrepresents United Nations Security Council Resolution 242, the status of disputed land, and Israeli military rule in the West Bank ("Jimmy Carter: America Must Recognize Palestine"). Former President Jimmy Carter falsified Arab-Israeli diplomatic history, again. In USA Today, again. He wants America to punish Israel for Palestinian rejectionism, again. Do Nobel Peace Prizes come with expiration dates?
Jimmy Carter's reaction after a diagnosis of brain cancer won renewed notice of his humanitarian work. Not so for his anti-Israel animus, chronic errors on Arab-Israeli matters and Arab financial support.
Foreign Policy gives former U.S. President Jimmy Carter space to shill yet again—foolish consistency and anti-Israel minds, etc.—for Hamas. Being an ex-president apparently means some people will listen no matter what nonsense you utter.
The observation that everyone's entitled to his or her opinion, just not to having it taken seriously applied in full to three March 29 Washington Post commentaries—one by that friend of Hamas, Jimmy Carter. 
The controversy surrounding a peace award offered to Jimmy Carter by an academic journal at Benjamin M. Cardozo Law School in New York City is understandable given the former president's antipathy toward Israel. 
President Carter misrepresents the terms of U.N. Resolution 242 and the "road map" to make the fallacious argument that President Obama's speech represents a continuation of longstanding American policy regarding Israeli withdrawals. 
No sooner had the rival Palestinian factions Fatah and Hamas initialed a unity agreement, than Jimmy Carter turned up on The Washington Post's Op-Ed page, urging the United States to give anti-Israel actors a chance. Again. 
The Elders of Zion, a czarist forgery, contributed to antisemitism in pre-Holocaust Europe. The Elders, as they call themselves, are all too real, and -- despite their stated intention -- helping spread anti-Zionism.