NYT columnist Michelle Goldberg referred to Hasan Piker's "jejune sympathies for all sorts of brutal anti-American regimes." If Piker's politics are "jejune," why is NYT promoting him so vigorously? Is it really Piker's politics that are jejune, or maybe it's Goldberg's journalism?
UPDATED: In both English and Arabic, Reuters improves an article which completely omitted the pro-terror and bigoted expressions of extremist media personalities Hasan Piker and Cenk Uygur, adding examples of their extremist statements.
