The Associated Press and NPR framing of Israel as an isolated pariah or the Wall Street Journal's framing of the Jewish state as great and powerful reflects the anti-Jewish tropes that have been popularized through the ages.
Despite extensive citation of the NGO in their coverage of Israel and Gaza, the BBC and New York Times have yet to report on Amnesty International’s findings on Hamas’ extrajudicial killings, CAMERA's Maia Zelkha writes at JNS.
The Guardian shouldn’t be seen as a respectable media outlet or simply one that is “far left,” CAMERA's Adam Levick writes in JNS. Rather, it's an propaganda organ that fuels antisemitism in the United Kingdom.
Rather than investigating whether the United Nations' exceptional scrutiny and condemnation of Israel is justified, the BBC usually simply amplifies it.
Despite the media’s best efforts to deflect, Mr. Graham’s message about the fundamental need to disarm Hamas is impossible to bury, CAMERA's Tamar Sternthal writes in The Washington Times.
Post-Oct. 7, one would have at least hoped that there would be some soul-searching among supporters of the Palestinian cause and a reaction along the lines of “this is not how we imagined Palestinian resistance” or a “not in my name” campaign. However, neither distancing nor clarity was to be, CAMERA's Adam Levick writes in JNS.
The AP says it’s the “definitive source for independent journalism from every corner of the globe.” But its coverage of Melat Kiros’ victory in the Colorado state primaries again proves the news agency to be the definitive sanitizer of global antisemitism, CAMERA's Tamar Sternthal writes in The Jerusalem Post.
During this past weekend's broadcasts on MS NOW, panelists and guests repeatedly flattened the strict legal definition of genocide into a casual political talking point. Genocide is a legal term, and whether a state committed it must be proved in court, not in the newsroom.
