CAMERA takes to the pages of The Washington Post to address the paper's coverage of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA). CAMERA tells the paper's readers about UNRWA's politicized definition of "refugee" and the organization's documented links to terror groups.
In several recent reports, Foreign Policy omits UNRWA’s history of promoting anti-Jewish violence and Palestinian rejectionism. Foreign Policy minimizes issues with the U.N. agency and unfairly stereotypes those seeking to reform aid to Palestinians.
In their recent reports, both Foreign Policy Magazine and The Washington Post omit UNRWA’s ties to terror groups and promotion of anti-Jewish violence. UNRWA, as CAMERA highlighted in a recent Op-Ed, has a long and sordid history—and the media should report it, not cover it up.
"What is Unrwa?" asks The Times profile which obscures more than its enlightens about the U.N. agency tasked with caring for Palestinian refugees. Its disproportionate staff size, its unique definition for refugee, its political activism, its teachers' antisemitism and incitement are just some of the ignored issues.
In a lengthy report, The Washington Post acts as a stenographer for UNRWA and terrorist supporting Palestinian officials.
UNRWA officials, John Ging (left) and Chris Gunness helped perpetuate the false story that Israel had shelled the Fakhoury UNRWA school in Gaza. Ging admits he knew none of the dead were on the school grounds.
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) is a constant source of criticism of Israel. It has also been an employer of terrorists who have attacked Israel.
The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinians in the Near East, a vocal critic of Israeli policies has been a source of financial and logistical suport for terror groups.