In a country that has seen rampant antisemitic attacks, historical and October 7th revisionism, British broadcasters have a duty not to use passive constructions that obfuscate responsibility. They also have a duty not to platform, without due diligence checks, those on the “Palestinian side” who openly support and eulogise the very terrorist groups who committed the October 7th atrocities. If Sky News obsessively coalesces around “the other side” narrative and offers Jewish voices no reprieve, must we conclude that it was never on the side of massacred Jews at all?
On the third anniversary of the October 7 massacre, MS NOW featured an op-ed by reporter Ayman Mohyeldin, who has a history of peddling antisemitic tropes, prominently at the top of its website.
On the third anniversary of the Oct. 7 attacks, many major media outlets focused on Palestinians and Gaza, or the upcoming Israeli elections, instead of Israeli grief and commemoration.
On Oct. 7, CAMERA's Adam Levick was interviewed by Israeli journalist Yaakov Lapin on his podcast The Rosshandler Report. They discussed how sections of the international media turned the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust into an unprovoked Israeli war against a faceless enemy.
Under what moral or journalistic compass does a leading news outlet mark the anniversary of a massacre by highlighting the victims’ ostensible failure to empathize with the plight of the other side, CAMERA's Tamar Sternthal asks in The Jerusalem Post.
The Guardian uncritically published an interview with Aimee Shalan, the incoming director of the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, in which she repeated libels against Israel, and downplayed the extent to which the pro-Palestinian movement is compromised by antisemitism.
CAMERA's Adam Levick was interviewed last week by Deborah Menelaws of the Scotland-based Global Vision TV to discuss media bias against Israel and the related refusal of most outlets to assign Palestinians moral agency.
CNN's Jeremy Diamond and Tal Shalev’s Oct. 8, 2026, article on Israeli hostages killed in captivity illustrates exactly how little blame the reporters place on Hamas for the hostage crisis, and how willingly they blame Israel for the crimes of Palestinian terrorists.
The BBC claims it needs independent verification to be able to report the killing of the Bibas family, but does it apply that standard to Palestinians?
In a Channel 4 Dispatches (UK) anti-Israel documentary whose 49-minute running time references Hamas only once, glosses over the Oct. 7 massacre in its first two minutes, sources its video footage to Hamas sympathisers and platforms individuals with a history of activism and close rapport with Hamas operatives - without disclosing either - what, then, are the film's producers really supporting?
