When some mostly Fatah-linked Palestinians serving sentences in Israeli prisons began a hunger strike on April 17th, the BBC produced three reports on that story on consecutive days. As was noted here at the time:
in all three of the reports, readers find (not for the first time) amplification of the PLOs narrative concerning Palestinian prisoners as promoted, for example, in a PLO media brief from June 2015. [emphasis added]
Report 1: Palestinians regard the detainees as political prisoners. Many have been convicted of attacks against Israelis and other offences.
Report 2: Palestinians say the detainees are political prisoners, while Israel describes them as terrorists (photo caption)
Palestinians regard the detainees as political prisoners. Many have been convicted of attacks against Israelis and other offences.
Report 3: Palestinians regard the detainees as political prisoners. Many have been convicted of attacks against Israelis.
The idea that people who have been convicted of perpetrating acts of terrorism are political prisoners is rejected in Europe and we certainly do not see the BBC promoting the notion that people imprisoned in the UK for terror related offences may be defined in such terms.
On May 2nd the BBC went one step further. Apparently not content with the above uncritical and unqualified amplification of the partisan narrative of the PLO, Jerusalem bureau correspondent Yolande Knell dispensed with the nicety Palestinians regard, electing to describe convicted terrorists as political prisoners in her (and hence the BBCs) own words.
Knells audio report was broadcast to Radio 4 audiences in the programme The World Tonight (from 39:09 here) and an almost identical version of the report was broadcast to BBC World Service audiences in the programme Newshour (from 38:11 here).
After listeners heard the sound of chanting, Knell began her report as follows: [emphasis added]
Knell: Chants of support for Palestinian political prisoners in Israel jails whove been refusing food for two weeks in a protest about conditions. As President Abbas prepares to meet President Trump, tensions are rising back home, leading to renewed clashes with Israeli soldiers. In Ramallah I meet Fadwa Barghouti. Her husband Marwan a popular figure in the presidents Fatah faction is serving five life sentences for murder in Israel and is leading the hunger strike. She says Palestinians care deeply for the prisoners.
With Fadwa Barghouti speaking in Arabic in the background, Knell then told listeners:
Knell:The whole Palestinian peoples been subjected to imprisonment, she tells me. Every Palestinian home knows what it means to have a prisoner, knows suffering and injured pride.
Of course very many Israeli homes know suffering too: the suffering of having had a loved one murdered by Palestinian terrorists in attacks such as those directed by Fadwa Barghoutis husband. In her typical style Yolande Knell, however, erased that terrorism and its victims from her pathos-rich yet obviously biased portrayal of terrorists on hunger strike (albeit in waning numbers which Knell neglected to mention) as political prisoners. She continued:
Knell: Earlier there was another rally in Gaza where Palestinians burnt posters of their president. Here the anger is driven by the damaging internal split between Fatah and its Islamist rival Hamas which controls Gaza as well as the moribund peace process.
Knell provided no evidence to back her bizarre claim that the demonstrations in Gaza on May 2nd were motivated by the moribund peace process. She went on:
Knell: At Birzeit University politics professor George Giacaman now sees Mr Abbas in a tricky position in Washington. He thinks hell come under pressure to return to peace talks with Israel without a deal to stop Jewish settlement growth on land the Palestinians want for their future state. That would be very hard to sell to the public.
Making no effort to inform BBC audiences that the existing agreements between Israel and the Palestinians the Oslo Accords do not place any limitations of construction in Israeli communities in Area C but do state that the final status of that area is to be determined in negotiations and its portrayal as Palestinian land therefore amplifies a partisan position, Knell allowed her interviewee to promote the myth of new settlements: a notion she and her editors know perfectly well is false. [emphasis added]
Giacaman: The Palestinian side has insisted throughout the past years that before negotiation starts, there has to be a hold to the settlement process. You have to keep in mind that this occupation of Palestinian land spearheaded by the establishment of new settlements in the West Bank undermines any political process, including of course the two-state solution.
Listeners then heard a recording from the press conference at the meeting between the Israeli prime minister and the US president earlier in the year.
Trump: As far as settlements, Id like to see you hold back on settlements for a little bit. Well work something out but I would like to see a deal be made. I think a deal will be made.
Knell next recycled the policy shift theme the BBC has been pushing since mid-February even though it was quickly refuted by US officials.
Knell: President Trump speaking to Israels prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in February. Israel had announced plans for several thousand new settler homes during his first month in office with relatively little criticism. And the new US leader appeared ready to break with long-established American foreign policy backing the creation of a Palestinian state as the only way to end the Middle East conflict.
Trump: So Im looking at two-state and one-state and I like the one that both parties like. Im very happy with the one that both parties like. I can live with either one. I thought for a while the two-state looked like it may be the easier of the two but, honestly, if Bibi and if the Palestinians
if Israel and the Palestinians are happy, Im happy with the one they like best.
Knell: Palestinians dont expect the meeting between Mr Abbas and Mr Trump to be so friendly. But the Palestinian president has tried to strengthen his hand by meeting the leaders of Washingtons close Arab allies Egypt and Jordan on his way to the White House. So could the US be about to broker another round of peace talks?
Giacaman: I doubt if anything would come of it. I dont think President Abbas has anything new to offer and I doubt Mr Trump is in a position to give the Israeli-Palestinian issue all his concentrations. The exposure to American public opinion and to the American leadership; this will help a lot because they are the only people in the world who can influence the Palestinians, Israelis to go to peace.
Knell closed her report:
Knell: Recently Palestinians have seen their cause overshadowed by other regional concerns. Their leaders now hope that the unpredictable approach of Mr Trump could work in their favour. Their official line is that he offers a rare chance for peace.
Knells portrayal of the chances of renewal of negotiations of course airbrushed very pertinent context such as the increasingly acrimonious rift between the PA and Hamas and the related fact that the long since unelected Mahmoud Abbas cannot even set foot in the Gaza Strip, let alone claim to represent all the Palestinians.
However, Knells aim in this report was obviously not to provide domestic and foreign BBC audiences with a realistic, accurate and impartial report on the story but to promote PLO talking points primarily the false claim that imprisoned terrorists are political prisoners.
BBCs Yolande Knell ditches any semblance of impartiality
BBC coverage of new Hamas document part three: BBC Radio 4
BBC coverage of new Hamas document part two: World Service radio
BBC News promotes PLO narrative in copious coverage of prisoners strike
BBC fails to provide crucial background in reports on Fatah prisoners strike
Identifying the BBCs anonymous mother of a Palestinian inmate
Inaccuracies and omissions in BBC News reporting on Abbas White House visit
How to complain to the BBC