An important CNN feature today on Munich massacre survivor Professor Shaul Ladany was marred by a tendentious, inaccurate description of the prisoners whose release the Palestinian terrorists demanded on Sept. 5, 1972 (“The Munich massacre: A survivor’s story,” by James Montague). An accompanying photo essay contained the following photos and captions:
In addition, the article states that “the members of the Black September made a demand that 200 political prisoners be released. . . ” (Emphasis added.)
Calling these prisoners “political” is a gross misrepresentation. Among the prisoners whose release was demanded was Kozo Okamoto, a Japanese Red Army member on contract for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine when, on May 30, 1972, he was part of a team that fired machine guns and threw hand grenades at passengers arriving in Tel Aviv on an Air France flight, killing 28 and wounding 76 (Encyclopedia of Terrorism and Political Violence, John Richard Thackrah, p 141-2). Does CNN really consider the killing and wounding of scores of civilians a political act?
Another name on the list was Andreas Baader, of the Red Army Faction, convicted of the arson bombing of a Frankfurt department store. Ulrike Meinhof, Baader’s comrade in the RAF, was another whose release was demanded. She was charged with numerous murders and the formation of a criminal organization. Again, is “political” the correct terminology for this activity?
According to Simon Reeve, author of One Day in September: The Full Story of the 1972 Munich Olympics Massacre, “Unless the Israelis were prepared to release scores of hardened Palestinian terrorists, the Black September guerillas would start executing their hostages.”
Earlier CNN articles referring to the terrorists’ demands did not include this problematic language. For instance, earlier this week Richard Allen Greene accurately wrote that the terrorists “demanded the release of 200 Arab inmates from Israeli prisons.”