A Washington Post analysis insisted that the New York Times is accurate, asking, "If the New York Times is so inaccurate, where are all of its corrections?" Good question. Where are its corrections?
When the American ambassador to the United Nations criticized the UN's controversial Human Rights Council, the New York Times didn't just report the news. It retorted it.
NYT journalists employ a singular set of criteria to assess racism in Israeli society versus others, similar to the double standard they use to condemn Israel for the sort of laws democratic countries routinely use to govern entry by foreigners into their borders.
The correction was published after a New York Times editorial wrongly claimed the United States has consistently held Israeli settlements to be "illegal."
An editorial today in The New York Times errs on two counts: 1) by claiming that the United States "has consistently held that settlement building in the occupied territories is illegal…." and 2) by claiming that a new Israeli law bars entry to any foreigner who supports the B.D.S. movement.
A New York Times Op-Ed by Elhanan Miller speaks of Abbas having accepted a Jewish state, and goes through contortions to mislead readers on this point.
The Times recently published an article about Israel's denial of a work visa to HRW's Omar Shakir, and relayed UN criticism of the sentence handed down by an Israeli court to an IDF soldier. But as is often the case with the NYT, readers were not provided with an objective presentation of the facts from a neutral standpoint or given enough info to form an opinion on the issues.
Another vitriolic Op-Ed in The New York Times takes aim at Israel. Here's what the latest, by Joint List leader Ayman Odeh, might have looked like if he were being candid.
After CAMERA contested partisan language that placed all Israeli settlements in "Palestinian territory," The New York Times has moved toward more impartial language on disputed lands.