Whether discussing Palestinian demands or Israeli demands, Palestinian rejection of Israeli positions or Israeli rejection of Palestinian positions, the newspaper identifies the same party as the obstacle to successful peace talks — Israel. Compare ;how the newspaper reports the positions of each side. Whether discussing Palestinian demands or Israeli demands, Palestinian rejection of Israeli positions or Israeli rejection of Palestinian positions, the newspaper identifies the same party as the obstacle to successful peace talks — Israel. Compare how the newspaper reports both sides’ positions. 
The New York Times seems to accept without question charges of Israeli brutality, but with other countries the paper can still muster the usual journalistic impulses to actually fact-check and doubt. After a press conference by Israeli officials highlighted continued Palestinian incitement, The New York Times covered the important story. CAMERA, which recently published an ad urging the newspaper to report on Palestinian hate rhetoric, considers this a step in the right direction. 
CAMERA prompts a New York Times correction after the newspaper claimed Israeli cities are "Palestinian," blamed Israel for water, gas and electricity shortages in Gaza. 
In the latest of his self-referential columns, Thomas Friedman once again invokes the ugly, anti-Semitic specter of a nefarious “Israeli lobby” that uses Jewish money and votes to corrupt American lawmakers in order to mold U.S. policy to Israel’s benefit and American harm. 
A New York Times editorial falsely claims that Israel has been "inveighing against any deal" with Iran despite the fact that Israeli leaders on numerous occasions have spoken out in favor of a "good deal." 
Even as Public Editor Margaret Sullivan admitted it was a mistake to feature the photo of the mother of a Palestinian murderer, The New York Times pattern of bad judgment continued. A few weeks ago, a former New York Times executive editor defended his newspaper's style of "impartial" journalism against the partisan advocacy journalism championed by Glenn Greenwald. Even as he was doing so, his newspaper continued to mix news with opinion. 
Every couple of years the newspaper runs an article that ostensibly focuses on Palestinian anti-Israel indoctrination. But not only do these articles ignore the worst examples of Palestinian incitement, they inevitably soft-pedal the entire issue, pretending that it is fueled by Israel in order to prevent peace negotiations, or that it is part of a bilateral phenomenon, with Israelis sharing the guilt– something that is clearly not the case.