The New York Times is using anonymous sources in its reports on key events in the US-Israel-Iran war. This leads to some incredible reporting, and not necessarily in a good way.
When it comes to Iran’s missile launchers, some may be entirely useless, damaged but repairable, or currently operational. There are myriad ways a launcher with little-to-no visible damage might no longer be functional. But the average intelligence analyst will count it as part of Iran’s launch capacity.
BDS activists are open about their radical, rejectionist aims. So why does the New York Times pretend that the group is merely opposed to Israeli policies in the West Bank?
