In Jerusalem yesterday, Old City streets and alleyways were awash in blue and white, as thousands of Israel youth took part in the Flag March, singing songs to mark Jerusalem Day, or the reunification of the city in 1967. Some engaged in violent clashes with local Palestinians. Some chanted hateful slurs, inciting violence.
Just over two weeks earlier, nearby streets in eastern Jerusalem were studded in red, green, black and white as thousands of Palestinians turned out for the funeral of Al Jazeera journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, many waving flags. Some engaged in violent clashes with Israeli police. Some chanted hateful slurs, inciting violence.
The were many clear parallels between the two competing displays of national sentiment.
But the international press didn’t see it that way. Or, more precisely, they didn’t report it that way.
For the foreign media, the Israeli procession was “nationalistic.” In contrast, the same news outlets are hard pressed to find anything “nationalistic” about the Palestinian procession although it contained many of the exact same elements as the Israeli event.
The glaringly inconsistent application of the term, often perceived as pejorative, is on colorful display in abundance of articles, headlines and photo captions. These skewed items prominently broadcast journalistic bias like so many flapping flags proudly signaling national fervor.
“Israeli nationalists march through Jerusalem’s Old City” is the Agence France Presse headline spotlighting the Israeli nationalists. It began:
Thousands of flag-waving Israelis on Sunday marched through Jerusalem’s Old City during a nationalist procession that regularly stokes Palestinian anger, a year after Jerusalem tensions exploded into war.
In contrast, AFP avoids describing Palestinian nationalistic behavior as just that. “Many Palestinians flew flags,” and “a Palestinian flag was flown from a drone,” AFP reported without deploying the pejorative n-word.
Further on, AFP reports:
Earlier, Jewish nationalists chanting pro-Israel slogans had visited Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa compound, located on Old City land that Jews revere as the Temple Mount.
Police reported that Palestinians had thrown rocks towards them from inside the mosque.
The disparity is blatant. “Jewish nationalists” chant slogans. In contrast, (police claim) “Palestinians” – not “Palestinian nationalists” – threw rocks. (Video footage documents Palestinian nationalists throwing rocks from inside the mosque, and thus there was no reason to qualify the information by attributing it to Israeli police.)
Masked rioters this morning hurling rocks from the Al-Aqsa compound pic.twitter.com/pzwfrvkBsc
— Israel Foreign Ministry (@IsraelMFA) May 29, 2022
Similarly, despite “the crowds who were hoisting Palestinian flags” and chanting nationalistic slogans at Abu Akleh’s funeral, AFP refrained from identifying these Palestinians as “nationalists” in its coverage of the funeral procession. Unlike its headline yesterday zeroing in on “Israeli nationalists,” AFP’s headline about the May 13 Palestinian funeral procession skips any reference to nationalists: “Thousands mourn at Jerusalem funeral for Al Jazeera journalist.”
Moreover, AFP refers to Palestinian nationalistic behavior only as an unconfirmed Israeli police claim:
Police said they had warned the crowd to stop “nationalistic” songs and were forced to act as “violent rioters (were) trying to disrupt the proper course of the funeral.”
As reported by Times of Israel, among the nationalistic Palestinian chants heard at Abu Akleh’s funeral was “Let the olive branch fall and raise the rifle.” AFP’s coverage ignored these slogans.
AFP’s double standard on Palestinian versus Israeli nationalists are efficiently packaged in the news agency’s photo captions. Members of the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine terror organization, brandishing weapons and traipsing over an Israeli flag as the Palestinian flag flutters in the background, are said to be denouncing Israel’s “nationalist ‘flag march.'” But DFLP’s own militaristic display literally trampling on another nation’s symbol of sovereignty? AFP editors, seemingly oblivious to the irony, detect no nationalism there.
Associated Press captions referencing the Israeli flag march are likewise extremely revealing. Palestinians surrounded by a sea of Palestinian flags participate in “a march,” with no descriptive label. But the Israelis marching with their national flag blanketing the streets? Israelis, uniquely, take part in a “nationalist parade.”
Even when screaming members of Palestinian terror organizations brandish weapons, and their juvenile admirers wave toy guns, AP captions finds nationalism only in the Israeli parade.
AP’s articles also largely followed the same pattern. “Israeli nationalists chant racist slogans in Jerusalem march” was yesterday’s Associated Press headline giving top billing to the Israeli nationalists and their racist chants. About the Israeli nationalists and their nationalistic songs, AP detailed:
Thousands of Israeli nationalists, some of them chanting “Death to Arabs,” paraded through the heart of the main Palestinian thoroughfare in Jerusalem’s Old City on Sunday, in a show of force that risked setting off a new wave of violence in the tense city. …
As the march got underway, groups of Orthodox Jewish youths gathered outside Damascus Gate, waving flags, singing religious and nationalistic songs, and shouting “the Jewish nation lives” before entering the Muslim Quarter. One large group chanted “Death to Arabs,” and “Let your village burn down” before descending into the Old City. …
Thousands of people normally take part in the march through the Muslim Quarter, including some who shout out nationalistic or racist slogans toward the Palestinians, before making their way to the Western Wall in the Jewish Quarter on the other side of the Old City. …
Ahead the march, there were small scuffles between Israeli nationalists and Palestinians, who threw chairs and bottles and shouted “God is great” at the marchers.…
Among the visitors was Itamar Ben-Gvir, leader of a small ultranationalist opposition party and a follower of the late racist rabbi, Meir Kahane, who entered with dozens of supporters under heavy police guard.
Counting the headline and the accompanying text, the AP’s article yesterday identified Israelis or their actions as “nationalist” or some derivative thereof half a dozen times. Palestinians appearing in the story — (for example, those who clash with the Israelis, or those operating “a drone flying a Palestinian flag”) — are no less fervent about their nationalism, but AP does not identify them as nationalists. Indeed, AP’s formulation says it all: a scuffle takes place between “Israeli nationalists and Palestinians.” Not “Israelis and Palestinians,” and not “Israeli nationalists and Palestinian nationalists.”‘
In contrast, AP’s treatment to Palestinian nationalism was considerably toned down in the news agency’s coverage of Abu Akleh’s nationalistic funeral procession. Thus, while the first paragraph reports “a procession that turned into perhaps the largest display of Palestinian nationalism in Jerusalem in a generation,” the Palestinian nationalists – unlike yesterday’s Israeli nationalists – don’t appear in the headline: “Israeli police beat pallbearers at journalist’s funeral.”
The article reports: “At the funeral, thousands of people, many waving Palestinian flags and chanting: ‘Palestine! Palestine!'” Note the “people,” as opposed to “Palestinian nationalists.” And while AP’s coverage of the Israeli parade twice referred to chants of “Death to Arabs,” the news agency’s coverage completely ignored the Palestinians’ threats to “Let the olive branch fall and raise the rifle.” It reported the less belligerent “Palestine! Palestine!” along with the more aggressive: “We sacrifice our soul and blood for you, Shireen.”
Unlike its coverage of Israeli “nationalist or racist slogans,” AP refrains from using this language to describe the Palestinian chants. Instead, AP cites Israeli police accusations (“police said”) about Palestinian “nationalist incitement,” using scare quotes to distance the reporter from that language:
Police said the crowd at the hospital was chanting “nationalist incitement,” ignored calls to stop and threw stones at them. “The policemen were forced to act,” police said. They issued a video in which a commander outside the hospital warns the crowd that police will come in if they don’t stop their incitement and “nationalist songs.”
Equivalent behavior from Palestinians and Israelis elicits grossly disparate coverage. The blatant inconsistencies signaling journalistic bias are about as subtle as calls to “Let the olive branch fall and raise the rifle.” Only the willfully blind could ignore them.