Undeterred by a federal statute calling for "objectivity and balance," Public Radio International encourages its listeners to turn to partisan resources — including Jimmy Carter's error-filled, anti-Israel polemic — for information about the Arab-Israeli conflict. 
The BBC's online account of the Six-Day War is marred by omissions, exaggerations, and outright anti-Israel bias. See also:
Writing in the dogmatically anti-Israel New York Review of Books, a former Times Executive Editor Joseph Lelyveld argues that Jimmy Carter didn't go far enough with his apartheid analogy. 
Some of Israel's critics would have you think they are under siege. Anyone who criticizes Israel, they say, will immediately be labeled an anti-Semite. But the claim is simply untrue. 
The multiple factual errors in Jimmy Carter's interviews with Wolf Blitzer and Larry King suggest that the former president either has scant knowledge of the facts, or little desire to truthfully discuss those facts. 
Carter's stunning admission that he ignored the key resource on the Israeli-Palestinian 
It is wrong to treat a partisan activist as a credible and objective expert. Yet Time turned to Jimmy Carter for its book on the Middle East.