The New York Times (re)introduced its audience to, and promoted the work of, Gazan blood-libel-photojournalist Saher Alghorra. Alghorra was unable to photograph a single Hamas fighter, but last year, photographed an emaciated baby who The Times later had to acknowledge was not healthy before the war, as the caption initially stated.
Despite its own reporting on Hamas embedding weapons and fighters in Gaza's civilian population, The New York Times still qualifies this is an Israeli accusation, rather than fact.
The New York Times does not like to use the word terrorist when it comes to Palestinian terror and it does not want the IDF to either. Perhaps the allergy to the word is why the paper of record still has not acknowledged the numerous announcements by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad outing many "journalists" as terrorists.
The Times' claim that Palestinian Tayseer Mleitat was killed by Israeli troops "at a protest" is a gross misrepresentation of information available in the paper's own archives: he was part of a crowd of hundreds which targeted soldiers with Molotov cocktails and rocks.
Here's what The New York Times hadn't told you about the children killed in Gaza, and also what they had told you without confirming. A hard, honest look at the facts reveals the truth that The Times conceals: It's Hamas' will.
Haaretz selectively translated The New York Times' widely criticized feature on dozens of children killed during fighting between Hamas and Israel. Out of the 68 children that The Times covered, Haaretz deleted just two. They happened to be the two Israeli children.
