How warm a handshake would CNN's most well-known interviewer give to Holocaust denier David Irving? How hospitable a platform would be given to anti-Semite David Duke? For anti-Semite and Holocaust denier Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the hand shake was very warm, and the platform was most hospitable. 
CAMERA's Op-Ed, entitled "Bending the Truth: Human rights group B’Tselem’s statistics are far from being trustworthy," explains how B'Tselem's lastest research on Palestinian fatalities "is as shoddy and unreliable as ever." 
Lonely Planet's Guide to Israel and the Palestinian Territories caters to the rabidly anti-Israel activist, providing a skewed view of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and even offering up suggestions about anti-Israel activism.
The letter responds to an article that describes Hezbollah as "the Lebanese Shi'ite political/paramilitary/social organization that is trained and financed by Iran," which omits a more basic description. 
The newspaper relays that a Palestinian boy was playing soccer when he was injured by an Israeli tank shell, leaving readers to believe the Israelis targeted sport-playing children — but the omitted details show otherwise. 
The Washington Post provided another example of the newspaper's odd obsession with Israel — a front page article about the old "who is a Jew?" controversy, with no current news peg. Even Post-weary readers complained. 
Clancy Chassay, a freelance journalist based in Beirut, reports for several British publications, including The Guardian. The multimedia journalist's five-part video series on life in Gaza uses multiple methods to distort the facts. 
Updated, September 5. The World Council of Churches will scrutinize Biblical teachings regarding the "Promised Land" at a conference later this month.
The Washington Post's "Activists Break Blockade of Gaza" belongs in journalism texts as an epitome of bias by omission. Written by National Public Radio's long-time Israel correspondent Linda Gradstein, the dispatch repeatedly drops or disguises facts necessary to understand the news being reported. 
The New York Times' Ethan Bronner trumpets claims by Peace Now despite the fact that Peace Now’s prior charges, about land ownership, were wildly off target. Can it be that inaccuracy is of little concern at the newspaper of record?