The venerable, American popular science magazine has become the latest venue for anti-Israel defamation. Why would editors cast aside the scientific tradition of fact-based inquiry in order to present pro-terrorist propaganda and the promotion of BDS in the guise of an analytic article?
The New York Times Opinion pages bombarded readers with an unending stream of anti-Israel Guest Essays, curating a lack of empathy for Israeli Jews and a skewed understanding of the conflict.
After reporting yesterday that "Iran has never threatened to attack Israel," the Associated Press' unfortunate clarification today casts those very threats as a matter of Israeli perception, as opposed to reality.
Media coverage of the delayed transfer of tons of mail sent to West Bank Palestinians doesn't deliver the full story, omitting crucial details along with relevant context and erasing nuance.
CAMERA's Israel office has prompted multiple media outlets, including Agence France Presse, Flash 90 (an Israeli photo service), and Times of Israel, to amend captions which had falsely characterized serial arsonists from Gaza as "activists."
Calling Israel’s rejection of Trump’s Gaza proposal an 'anti-peace' move frames security concerns as unimportant and oversimplifies 'peace' as a concept that means the same thing to everyone.
Multiple levels of hearsay now suffices for reporting, according to NPR. In lowering its standards, it repeated false statistics that it did not bother to fact-check.
The New York Times (re)introduced its audience to, and promoted the work of, Gazan blood-libel-photojournalist Saher Alghorra. Alghorra was unable to photograph a single Hamas fighter, but last year, photographed an emaciated baby who The Times later had to acknowledge was not healthy before the war, as the caption initially stated.
The Guardian shouldn’t be seen as a respectable media outlet or simply one that is “far left.” Rather, it's an propaganda organ that fuels antisemitism in the United Kingdom.
NYT columnist Michelle Goldberg referred to Hasan Piker's "jejune sympathies for all sorts of brutal anti-American regimes." If Piker's politics are "jejune," why is NYT promoting him so vigorously? Is it really Piker's politics that are jejune, or maybe it's Goldberg's journalism?
The parents of American Malki Roth, killed in a terror attack 25 years ago in Israel, sue one of the terrorists responsible. A new website helps Israeli and Jewish travelers find safe(r) destinations. The IDF locates the grave of a soldier after almost 78 years.
Trita Parsi is back on ABC, where he continues to do Iran's PR for them. This time, the Quincy Institute man is making excuses for threats against President Trump's life.
