The venerable, American popular science magazine has become the latest venue for anti-Israel defamation. Why would editors cast aside the scientific tradition of fact-based inquiry in order to present pro-terrorist propaganda and the promotion of BDS in the guise of an analytic article?
The New York Times Opinion pages bombarded readers with an unending stream of anti-Israel Guest Essays, curating a lack of empathy for Israeli Jews and a skewed understanding of the conflict.
After reporting yesterday that "Iran has never threatened to attack Israel," the Associated Press' unfortunate clarification today casts those very threats as a matter of Israeli perception, as opposed to reality.
Media coverage of the delayed transfer of tons of mail sent to West Bank Palestinians doesn't deliver the full story, omitting crucial details along with relevant context and erasing nuance.
CAMERA's Israel office has prompted multiple media outlets, including Agence France Presse, Flash 90 (an Israeli photo service), and Times of Israel, to amend captions which had falsely characterized serial arsonists from Gaza as "activists."
In her Sojourners article, Rev. Gerlyn Henry misleads her readers by urging them to treat the falsehoods and misrepresentations of a propagandist as prophetic truth.
The New York Times appears to have fabricated a quote, alleging Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is against Islam. CAMERA has contacted The New York Times to seek a correction, or substantiation if it can provide it.
ABC's Denver affiliate recently aired a clip from an interview with congressional candidate Melat Kiros, during which she couldn't bring herself to say that a 2025 firebombing against Jews in Boulder was antisemitic. ABC needed to push back, but didn't.
NPR eschewed good journalistic practice and the use of empirical evidence in favor of wholly unsupported, alleged anecdotal evidence. The result was a podcast that demonized Israelis.
The BBC is a public service. Licence fee payers do not pay for the personal views of elitist middle-class progressives, or payouts to victims of racist bullying. They pay for a service which provides impartial and accurate news and exists to inform and to educate. How long before they refuse to pay for it anymore.
The New York Times neglects to correct after falsely reporting that all reported 750,000 Palestinian refugees from the 1948 war were expelled. Multiple media outlets including AFP, Guardian and Reuters have previously corrected the identical error, which ignores that vast majority fled at the urging of their own leaders.
IDF on high alert before Israeli elections, Israeli defense capacities develop, and a new cycling park open in Be'eri. News You Didn't Hear About this Week.
If The Guardian is willing to platform Klein and Taylor without challenge, both of whom advance the belief in which global elites are united in the defence of an “Israeli ethnostate,” erase Hamas from the narrative entirely when deploying genocide libels, and posit antizionist Jews as the default Jewish opinion while defaming dissenters as “Jewish fascists,” at what point does the outlet cease to do its own “radical thinking” and instead become a platform undergirded by deep-seated antisemitic and conspiratorial claims?
Michigan's U.S. Senate Candidate Abdul El-Sayed recently exclaimed that Israel was not our ally, and insinuated that Iran was our friend. Here's how ABC should have corrected him.
On the anniversary of the Oct. 7 massacre, Spain’s public broadcaster chose to highlight not the massacre itself but an accusation of “genocide” against the people who had been attacked.
