Another vitriolic Op-Ed in The New York Times takes aim at Israel. Here's what the latest, by Joint List leader Ayman Odeh, might have looked like if he were being candid.
The newspaper reports that Donald Trump vowed to support Israel "no matter what," and that a Paris declaration calls for a return to the 1967 lines. These are unabashed inventions on the part of the newspaper.
CAMERA's essay in the January issue of The Tower Magazine discusses the express refusal by New York Times editors to refer to "disputed land" in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, looks at how other disputes are described, and explores what the double standard means.
Palestinian leaders say anti-Israel violence is a result of desperation over the collapse of peace talks, Reuters reports. And what do Israeli leaders say? For that, readers are forced to look elsewhere.
In pushing back against the UNESCO resolution casting the Temple Mount as an exclusively Muslim site, UNESCO's secretary general herself downplayed the Jewish connection to the sacred hilltop. CAMERA has repeatedly held journalists accountable for the same mistake.
In his coverage of recent UN speeches by Benjamin Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas, the new New York Times bureau chief erased key distinctions with a "both sides do it" cliché, but made inappropriate distinctions by editorializing about a "brash" Netanyahu.
Plenty of independent analysts have highlighted the pernicious role played by Palestinian incitement to violence. So why does AFP pretend only Israel says it's a problem?