"One state is enough," a March 4 commentary by an organizer of the discredited Harvard University anti-Israel conference, exemplifies a chronic problem on The Washington Post's Op-Ed page -- hospitality to unrebutted anti-Israel offerings by outside contributors. 
When MSNBC announced that commentator Pat Buchanan would not be returning after a four-month break, some news media conservatives defended him and charged the left-leaning cable channel with ideological censorship. They ignored a defining characteristic of Buchanan, his antisemitism -- something William F. Buckley, father of the modern conservative movement, identified 20 years ago. 
Inept call-handling by C-SPAN's Washington Journal hosts, especially anti-Jewish, anti-Israeli callers, was on display in the Feb. 5, 2012 broadcast.
A series of Washington Post articles underscore that the closer terrorism comes to Washington, D.C., the more precisely the newspaper describes it. But when Israelis are targeted, the paper refers to euphemisms like "militant," guerrilla" and "activist."
The Baltimore Sun headlined a February 13 editorial "Mr. Abbas' mission; Unity between Hamas and the Palestinian Authority need not be the end of peace talks with Israel -- but it will require real statesmanship." CAMERA's next-day letter introduced Sun readers to the contradictory reality. 
Within 24 hours The New York Times ran two news articles and one editorial on the documentary The Third Jihad. Biased by omission, all three served CAIR's Islamist agenda. 
Criticizing continued repression by Egypt's military, a Baltimore Sun editorial described that country's Muslim Brotherhood as "moderate Islamist." A CAMERA letter, published the same week, suggested that description was a wishful and dangerous oxymoron.
J Street President Jeremy Ben-Ami used a Washington Post Op-Ed to recommend "redefining" what it means to be pro-Israel. He employed several strawmen arguments to make his case. CAMERA's rebuttal letter, featured under The Post's "Taking Exception" heading, spotlighted the evasions in Ben-Ami's claims.
In October, The Washington Post's foreign news operation airbrushed terrorists included in the Gilead Shalit-Palestinian prisoner exchange. Early November coverage was "all hole, no bagel." And three major articles in late November and early December went downhill from there. Five Washington Post articles on Israel-related news in the first half of November highlight a continuing foreign desk problem: Palestinian-centric reporting misses the forest and a lot of the trees as well.