The New York Times, one of the most influential newspapers in the world, not only influences its readers but also has significant impact on the news judgment and editorial perspective of other media. The caliber of accuracy, balance and thoroughness in this publication are therefore of particular importance.
The New York Times continues to eschew objectivity and employ a double standard in its coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict. Our six-month study of the newspaper's coverage details how the newspaper treats Israel with a harsher standard, omits context, and shows a clear preference for the Palestinian narrative.
A recent study highlighted how Hamas has been manipulating casualty stats as part of the terror group's effort to win the information battlefield. But as CAMERA tells the Washington Examiner, too many press outlets have been willfully, and woefully, duped into broadcasting Hamas propaganda. And they should've known better.
There’s more than one way to erase the hostages held by Hamas and other terror groups in the Gaza Strip. The more genteel journalistic erasures exact far greater and lasting damage than the bombastic street displays.
New York Times reporters and editors apparently didn't want readers to know that the man who spewed antisemitism at a Houston mosque was the mosque's imam. The deceived their audience by misrepresenting him as a passing guest.
Last month in Amsterdam, gangs turned a soccer match into a horrifying "Jew hunt," chasing and savagely beating victims. Instead of condemning the violence, some media outlets spread baseless claims to excuse it. What really happened reveals an alarming narrative and the persistence of antisemitism. Watch the full story here.
After last week’s “Jew hunt” in Amsterdam, anti-Israel activists rushed to excuse the brutal assaults. If Israelis and Jews across the city were beaten down and kicked while lying defenseless and unconscious, the focus, they insisted, should be on Jewish behavior. The media soon joined in.
Although United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 calls for the disarming of Hezbollah through Lebanon, the New York Times misinforms readers by citing only the part of the resolution calling on the terror group to evacuate southern Lebanon.
Some do a better job at informing readers of Nasrallah’s reign of terror and destruction, others do worse, but few are as egregiously distorted as CNN's obituary.
Iran and its proxies are likely to appreciate a New York Times report on Iran and its proxies, since it embraces the language of the terrorists axis of resistance.