The Israeli Conspiracist Behind Carlson’s “False Flag” Insinuations
Tucker Carlson insinuated that Hamas' massacre on Oct. 7, 2023, was an Israel "false flag" operation. This outrageous claim has a surprising Israeli source.
Omri Tubi
The Israeli Conspiracist Behind Carlson’s “False Flag” Insinuations
Tucker Carlson is spreading conspiracy theories regarding Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023, attack and the Israel-Hamas war. Apparently, there's an Israeli conspiracist involved.
Incorrect Times
The New York Times neglects to correct after falsely reporting that all reported 750,000 Palestinian refugees from the 1948 war were expelled. Multiple media outlets including AFP, Guardian and Reuters have previously corrected the identical error, which ignores that vast majority fled at the urging of their own leaders.
News You Didn’t Hear About This Week – Friday, October 23, 2026
IDF on high alert before Israeli elections, Israeli defense capacities develop, and a new cycling park open in Be'eri. News You Didn't Hear About this Week.
The News You Didn’t Hear About This Week: Friday, Oct. 2, 2026
Dutch customs conduct searches for West Bank products after new law, Flydubai hijacking attempt creates logistical challenges as many Israelis are stranded abroad, and former staffers voice concern with New York magazine's coverage of the Middle East.
Tucker Carlson Loves You
Tucker Carlson said he loves Israel. But overwhelming evidence shows otherwise.
Impolitico
A Politico article described Tucker Carlson as an "Israel-skeptical pundit." But the truth is far worse.
The Times’ Islamic Republic of Economics
Should the U.S. let Iran control Hormuz? A New York Times op-ed suggested it should, but the logic it employs is questionable.
The Old News of the “New Physics of War”
A New York Times op-ed claims the recent wars in the Middle East demonstrate "the new physics of power." But these allegedly new physics are actually quite old.
Jejune Journalism
NYT columnist Michelle Goldberg referred to Hasan Piker's "jejune sympathies for all sorts of brutal anti-American regimes." If Piker's politics are "jejune," why is NYT promoting him so vigorously? Is it really Piker's politics that are jejune, or maybe it's Goldberg's journalism?