The Norwegian Refugee Council's Communications Adviser, Shaina Low, blamed Israel exclusively for all suffering in Gaza since the war began while lamenting the lack of sufficient aid, including dual-use items such as concrete, cement, rebar, and lubricant oil.
Even by the standards we’re used to in the Scottish media, it’s rare, and particularly reprehensible, for a journalist to defend the 2nd Intifada - the four-year campaign of suicide bombings, and other deadly attacks, targeting Jewish civilians at bus stops, cafes and pizza places.
CNN cited the Reporters Without Borders index to illustrate a decline in Israeli press freedom. But why is Israel ranked lower than Qatar and even Western Sahara on the Reporters Without Borders Index?
While nothing much shocks us anymore about the Guardian's institutional hostility to Israel and Jews, it's important to stress that, until now, we've never previously encountered an inversion of the 1929 Hebron Massacre that frames Jewish victims as the culprits at any other British outlet.
Same day reporting by CNN, Reuters, The Washington Post, and The New York Times framed the incident near Tell as a case of settler violence, while omitting key details. Because these mainstream media failed to do their jobs, it befell to CAMERA to investigate who the individuals involved in the incident were.
Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad admit 18 "medical workers" in Gaza were actually terrorists. London's Hackney mayor gives Haifa mayor until October 7, 2026, to respond to the borough's desire to end twin city relationship. Israeli tourists are attacked at their hotel in Crete.
In a supposed overview of Israel's military engagements in four fronts over the last 25 years, NPR left out critical, historical facts. The result was a report that focused only on Israel's present military positions, without explaining what transpired between then and now.
The New York Times does not like to use the word terrorist when it comes to Palestinian terror and it does not want the IDF to either. Perhaps the allergy to the word is why the paper of record still has not acknowledged the numerous announcements by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad outing many "journalists" as terrorists.
When covering the killing of FIFA-linked officials and other soccer figures linked to designated terror groups, there's no journalistic "overtime" limit in getting the facts right. Why hasn't Reuters updated readers with new information on soccer players and officials who moonlighted as terror operatives?
