Conflict and War

Interview: Who controls the narrative about Israel?

CAMERA's Adam Levick was interviewed by Olga Deutsch of NGO Monitor, where he discussed the erasure of Palestinian agency, and how media bias and the NGO network work hand in hand to shape and perpetuate an anti-Israel narrative.

Incorrect Times

The New York Times neglects to correct after falsely reporting that all reported 750,000 Palestinian refugees from the 1948 war were expelled. Multiple media outlets including AFP, Guardian and Reuters have previously corrected the identical error, which ignores that vast majority fled at the urging of their own leaders.

BEHIND THE GUARDIAN’S ‘MORAL TEAR’: AN OLD THREAD IN THE TAPESTRY OF ANTISEMITISM

If The Guardian is willing to platform Klein and Taylor without challenge, both of whom advance the belief in which global elites are united in the defence of an “Israeli ethnostate,” erase Hamas from the narrative entirely when deploying genocide libels, and posit antizionist Jews as the default Jewish opinion while defaming dissenters as “Jewish fascists,” at what point does the outlet cease to do its own “radical thinking” and instead become a platform undergirded by deep-seated antisemitic and conspiratorial claims?

See No Evil: How NPR Enables Hamas’ Press Charade

NPR went on a gaslighting blitz when it pretended that journalists out of Gaza aren't under Hamas control (including their own reporter there) and failed to acknowledge to its audience how many "journalists" in Gaza were outed as terrorists.

ALWAYS ‘THE OTHER SIDE,’ NEVER THE SIDE OF THE JEWS: SKY NEWS’ OCTOBER 7TH REVISIONISM IN FOCUS

In a country that has seen rampant antisemitic attacks, historical and October 7th revisionism, British broadcasters have a duty not to use passive constructions that obfuscate responsibility. They also have a duty not to platform, without due diligence checks, those on the “Palestinian side” who openly support and eulogise the very terrorist groups who committed the October 7th atrocities. If Sky News obsessively coalesces around “the other side” narrative and offers Jewish voices no reprieve, must we conclude that it was never on the side of massacred Jews at all?